Greetings of the Season? Glory to Earth and all the species she has spawned.

Deprived of my camera, my mind seems to wander into strange places. In the persona of a timeless GreenMan, in service to a living Earth, I began reflecting on the Christmas and New Year Holidays.

Who are we? Who is celebrating? Why? What? And the significance of the date 2010?

Well, the date and the celebration refer to an event, reputed to have occurred about 2000 or more years ago, embellished and clothed in centuries of layers of glorious romance and mystery, the birth of a child, said to be born in a Middle Eastern city called Bethlehem.

Over centuries, many billions of humans of the species Homo Sapiens consider the man that grew from that child to be much more than another teacher, but a higher being, they called a god, or, at least, a son of the most powerful being they could conceive, a holy spirit, a GOD.

Songs and stories and celebrations have evolved over many centuries. Glorious song, chants, rituals and traditions have spawned allegiances so deep that adherents to what became a religion have committed their lives both in devotion and violent devastating wars (against other humans that did not hold the exact same perspective as they).

And what is the significance of all this to a Living Earth?

Today, Earth is confronting multiple crises, threatening the entire living Earth and her life support systems, demonstrably resulting from activities of the big brained, inventive hominid.

Curiously, many high minded leaders and guides advise these hominids to “Live in the NOW.”

From the perspective of Earth and the Universe, this species is about 200,000 years old (200,000 cycles about her source of energy). This thesis is proposed by curious hominids that have explored with rigor. They have also postulated that
there was a prior species they named dinosaurs.

From Wikipedia:
Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrate animals for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (about 230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (about 65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species.


Given all of the above, perhaps we would be better served to celebrate the arrival of 202,010 instead of 2010. The NOW we are living in is a brief marker in Universal history. Consider that.

Consider the magnificent dinosaurs, giants with small brains. They lived over 160 million years. Homo Sapiens, with their magnificent brains, are on the verge… in Universal time, just moments away from self annihilation. The dinosaurs were not smart enough to alter their environment. Humans, on the other hand, have altered the air, the sea, the land and even life forms. They have created toxics of mass destruction and mirror viruses, actively engaged in consuming all.

Kinda gives one pause to reconsider our brief spurt of life.

Tune in tomorrow! See if we manage to wake up in time to avert our own demise.

Glory to Earth and all the species she has spawned.

Advertisements

A Clearminded (insiders) view of Copenhagen

I have enormous respect for Alan AtKisson. He was representing the UN Division of Sustainable Development at the CoP-15 Summit and has reported his unique and very thoughtful observations on his blog. Better I refer you there than attempt to explain.

http://alanatkisson.wordpress.com

Holiday Gifts…

If you find yourself in a dilemma about what gift to give someone who has everything (or as most of us, much more than is needed for a comfortable lifestyle), or if you’ve received a giant bonus for meritorious work at your financial institution, consider a gift through the Heifer Foundation.

If you are not familiar with Heifer, they have been successfully working for years to deliver a wide variety of farm animals and plants, as well as train recipients on how to care for their gifts to significantly improve lives and personal economics in countries around the world.


Heifer International is at: http://www.heifer.org/

56 newspapers in 45 countries Speak for Wisdom and commitment at Copenhagen

Published: December 06, 2009 7:10 PM ET

NEW YORK Tomorrow 56 newspapers in 45 countries take the perhaps
unprecedented step of speaking with one voice through a common editorial.
Many if not most will publish it on the front page, warning of a “profound
emergency.”

The Guardian of London, which helped draft the editorial, published it
today, with a note at the end. Here it is.
*

Unless we combine to take decisive action, climate change will ravage our
planet, and with it our prosperity and security. The dangers have been
becoming apparent for a generation. Now the facts have started to speak: 11
of the past 14 years have been the warmest on record, the Arctic ice-cap is
melting and last year’s inflamed oil and food prices provide a foretaste of
future havoc. In scientific journals the question is no longer whether
humans are to blame, but how little time we have got left to limit the
damage. Yet so far the world’s response has been feeble and half-hearted.

Climate change has been caused over centuries, has consequences that will
endure for all time and our prospects of taming it will be determined in
the next 14 days. We call on the representatives of the 192 countries
gathered in Copenhagen not to hesitate, not to fall into dispute, not to
blame each other but to seize opportunity from the greatest modern failure
of politics. This should not be a fight between the rich world and the poor
world, or between east and west. Climate change affects everyone, and must
be solved by everyone.

The science is complex but the facts are clear. The world needs to take
steps to limit temperature rises to 2C, an aim that will require global
emissions to peak and begin falling within the next 5-10 years. A bigger
rise of 3-4C – the smallest increase we can prudently expect to follow
inaction – would parch continents, turning farmland into desert. Half of
all species could become extinct, untold millions of people would be
displaced, whole nations drowned by the sea. The controversy over emails by
British researchers that suggest they tried to suppress inconvenient data
has muddied the waters but failed to dent the mass of evidence on which
these predictions are based.

Few believe that Copenhagen can any longer produce a fully polished treaty;
real progress towards one could only begin with the arrival of President
Obama in the White House and the reversal of years of US obstructionism.
Even now the world finds itself at the mercy of American domestic politics,
for the president cannot fully commit to the action required until the US
Congress has done so.

But the politicians in Copenhagen can and must agree the essential elements
of a fair and effective deal and, crucially, a firm timetable for turning
it into a treaty. Next June’s UN climate meeting in Bonn should be their
deadline. As one negotiator put it: “We can go into extra time but we can’t
afford a replay.”

At the deal’s heart must be a settlement between the rich world and the
developing world covering how the burden of fighting climate change will be
divided – and how we will share a newly precious resource: the trillion
or so tonnes of carbon that we can emit before the mercury rises to
dangerous levels.

Rich nations like to point to the arithmetic truth that there can be no
solution until developing giants such as China take more radical steps than
they have so far. But the rich world is responsible for most of the
accumulated carbon in the atmosphere – three-quarters of all carbon
dioxide emitted since 1850. It must now take a lead, and every developed
country must commit to deep cuts which will reduce their emissions within a
decade to very substantially less than their 1990 level.

Developing countries can point out they did not cause the bulk of the
problem, and also that the poorest regions of the world will be hardest
hit. But they will increasingly contribute to warming, and must thus pledge
meaningful and quantifiable action of their own. Though both fell short of
what some had hoped for, the recent commitments to emissions targets by the
world’s biggest polluters, the United States and China, were important
steps in the right direction.

Social justice demands that the industrialised world digs deep into its
pockets and pledges cash to help poorer countries adapt to climate change,
and clean technologies to enable them to grow economically without growing
their emissions. The architecture of a future treaty must also be pinned
down – with rigorous multilateral monitoring, fair rewards for protecting
forests, and the credible assessment of “exported emissions” so that the
burden can eventually be more equitably shared between those who produce
polluting products and those who consume them. And fairness requires that
the burden placed on individual developed countries should take into
account their ability to bear it; for instance newer EU members, often much
poorer than “old Europe”, must not suffer more than their richer partners.

The transformation will be costly, but many times less than the bill for
bailing out global finance – and far less costly than the consequences of
doing nothing.

Many of us, particularly in the developed world, will have to change our
lifestyles. The era of flights that cost less than the taxi ride to the
airport is drawing to a close. We will have to shop, eat and travel more
intelligently. We will have to pay more for our energy, and use less of it.

But the shift to a low-carbon society holds out the prospect of more
opportunity than sacrifice. Already some countries have recognized that
embracing the transformation can bring growth, jobs and better quality
lives. The flow of capital tells its own story: last year for the first
time more was invested in renewable forms of energy than producing
electricity from fossil fuels.

Kicking our carbon habit within a few short decades will require a feat of
engineering and innovation to match anything in our history. But whereas
putting a man on the moon or splitting the atom were born of conflict and
competition, the coming carbon race must be driven by a collaborative
effort to achieve collective salvation.

Overcoming climate change will take a triumph of optimism over pessimism,
of vision over short-sightedness, of what Abraham Lincoln called “the
better angels of our nature”.

It is in that spirit that 56 newspapers from around the world have united
behind this editorial. If we, with such different national and political
perspectives, can agree on what must be done then surely our leaders can
too.

The politicians in Copenhagen have the power to shape history’s judgment on
this generation: one that saw a challenge and rose to it, or one so stupid
that we saw calamity coming but did nothing to avert it. We implore them to
make the right choice.
*
This editorial will be published tomorrow by 56 newspapers around the world
in 20 languages including Chinese, Arabic and Russian. The text was drafted
by a Guardian team during more than a month of consultations with editors
from more than 20 of the papers involved. Like the Guardian most of the
newspapers have taken the unusual step of featuring the editorial on their
front page.

So What’s not to like about a Comcast-NBC Merger?

Janine Benyus: Biomimicry in Action

I’ve just found a new presentation I had not head by my friend Janine Benyus. It is more important and more interesting that what I might say, Do give it your time.

Have you forgotten your intimate connection to our living Earth?

Are you aware of how many animal architects have designed homes for their young?

Watch the short video at the TED website and come back and comment.

Weapons or Tea? What is Success in Afghanistan?

How and why is America threatened by conflicts in Afghanistan and Pakistan?
Is it an issue of military security? How are we threatened by the Taliban?

Is it an issue of humanitarian concern, for human rights for the masses of people living in poverty and ignorance?
Is it an issue of the destructive impact of the vast quantities of opium grown and marketed to Americans? (A primary source of financial support for the Taliban).

In a world under the cloud of annihilation because of the compounding of human abuses of nature and her resources, is this a place to put our energies and resources?

Are military forces the best way to deal with this?
No wonder President Obama pondered long on this one.
It is not an easy decision.
We know military engagement is costly at many levels…

And we have learned from Greg Mortenson and his book 3 Cups of Tea of the power and effectiveness of taking the time to build relationships and understanding with powerful tribal leaders… and building local schools that educate girls.

Is there some way to factor all of the knows issues together and come up with a positive solution that serves Afghanistan in the short range and global wellbeing and survival long range?

I am personally not convinced that military offensives are the best way.
How do we cajole the Militant/Religious groups and their leaders whose power is based in the Islamic world of the 7th century, to abandon their 7th century mentality and join the rest of us in the 21st century?

Isn’t it curious that the prime thing that the radical Islamist movement (Sunnis in Afghanistan) has easily accepted from the 21st century is weapons?

How can we help them to join us in understanding and taking action toward a much larger and more serious issue? How can we live in harmony with each other and alter our behavior so that or species can survive from the damage we’ve done to our incredible home, planet EARTH?

Tea may be the best beginning.

Reference: Wikipedia: Taliban

%d bloggers like this: